{"id":1605,"date":"2026-10-22T13:02:17","date_gmt":"2026-10-22T05:02:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/brt-testing.com\/?p=1605"},"modified":"2026-10-27T13:40:44","modified_gmt":"2026-10-27T05:40:44","slug":"cone-calorimeter-testing-what-does-it-measure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brt-testing.com\/tr\/cone-calorimeter-testing-what-does-it-measure\/","title":{"rendered":"Cone Calorimeter Testing: What Does It Measure?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Short Answer<\/h2>\n

A cone calorimeter test<\/strong> measures how much heat a burning specimen releases, how quickly, and what else comes off it \u2014 smoke, mass loss and combustion gases \u2014 while the specimen is exposed to a controlled level of radiant heat from a conical heater. The instrument’s core outputs are heat release rate and its peak, total heat release, time to ignition, mass loss rate, effective heat of combustion, smoke production rate and specific extinction area, plus carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide yields.<\/p>\n

One version point is worth noting before anything else, because it appears constantly in older literature and in supplier datasheets. The third edition, ISO 5660-1:2015, cancelled and replaced both parts of the 2002 edition \u2014 ISO 5660-1:2002 and ISO 5660-2:2002 \u2014 and merged them into a single document 2<\/a>. Any document still citing “ISO 5660-2” as a current test method is out of date, and the smoke measurement that used to sit in that part is now handled within the same run.<\/p>\n

Everything else attributed to cone calorimeter testing is derived from those. MARHE, the maximum average rate of heat emission used in the European railway standard, is a calculation on the heat release curve, not a separate sensor reading. If you want to know which instrument you need rather than what it reports, our comparison of SBI versus cone calorimeter systems<\/a> covers that decision directly.<\/p>\n

The Nine Outputs a Cone Calorimeter Test Produces<\/h2>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u8f93\u51fa\u91cf<\/th>\n\u7269\u7406\u542b\u4e49<\/th>\n\u5355\u4f4d<\/th>\n\u4e3a\u4ec0\u4e48\u6709\u4eba\u8981\u5b83<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\u70ed\u91ca\u653e\u901f\u7387 HRR<\/td>\n\u5355\u4f4d\u9762\u79ef\u5355\u4f4d\u65f6\u95f4\u91ca\u653e\u7684\u70ed\u91cf<\/td>\nkW\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n\u706b\u52bf\u589e\u957f\u7684\u76f4\u63a5\u5ea6\u91cf<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u5cf0\u503c\u70ed\u91ca\u653e\u901f\u7387 pkHRR<\/td>\nHRR \u66f2\u7ebf\u7684\u6700\u5927\u503c<\/td>\nkW\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n\u6700\u5e38\u88ab\u5f15\u7528\uff0c\u4e5f\u6700\u6613\u53d7\u566a\u58f0\u5f71\u54cd<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u603b\u70ed\u91ca\u653e THR<\/td>\n\u7d2f\u8ba1\u91ca\u653e\u70ed\u91cf<\/td>\nMJ\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n\u6750\u6599\u300c\u71c3\u6599\u603b\u91cf\u300d\u7684\u5ea6\u91cf<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u70b9\u71c3\u65f6\u95f4 TTI<\/td>\n\u4ece\u5f00\u59cb\u53d7\u8f90\u7167\u5230\u6301\u7eed\u706b\u7130<\/td>\ns<\/td>\n\u6750\u6599\u88ab\u70b9\u71c3\u7684\u96be\u6613<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u8d28\u91cf\u635f\u5931\u901f\u7387 MLR<\/td>\n\u70ed\u89e3\u4e0e\u71c3\u70e7\u9020\u6210\u7684\u5931\u91cd<\/td>\ng\/(m\u00b2\u00b7s)<\/td>\n\u70ed\u89e3\u52a8\u529b\u5b66\u7684\u5165\u53e3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u6709\u6548\u71c3\u70e7\u70ed EHC<\/td>\n\u5355\u4f4d\u8d28\u91cf\u635f\u5931\u5bf9\u5e94\u7684\u653e\u70ed<\/td>\nMJ\/kg<\/td>\n\u5224\u65ad\u6c14\u76f8\u71c3\u70e7\u5b8c\u5168\u7a0b\u5ea6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u4ea7\u70df\u901f\u7387 SPR<\/td>\n\u70df\u7684\u751f\u6210\u901f\u7387<\/td>\nm\u00b2\/s<\/td>\n\u6392\u70df\u4e0e\u80fd\u89c1\u5ea6\u8bbe\u8ba1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u6bd4\u6d88\u5149\u9762\u79ef SEA<\/td>\n\u5355\u4f4d\u8d28\u91cf\u635f\u5931\u4ea7\u751f\u7684\u70df<\/td>\nm\u00b2\/kg<\/td>\n\u6750\u6599\u56fa\u6709\u53d1\u70df\u7279\u6027<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CO \/ CO\u2082 \u4ea7\u7387<\/td>\n\u71c3\u70e7\u6c14\u4f53\u4ea7\u7269<\/td>\nkg\/kg<\/td>\n\u6bd2\u6027\u8bc4\u4f30\u7684\u8f93\u5165<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Heat release rate and peak heat release rate<\/h3>\n

HRR is the reason the instrument exists. It is derived, not measured directly: the machine measures the oxygen consumed by the fire and converts it using the oxygen consumption principle, which ISO 5660-1 states as 13.1 \u00d7 10\u00b3 kJ of heat released per kilogram of oxygen consumed 1<\/a>. Peak HRR is simply the maximum of that curve \u2014 and it is the figure most often quoted and most often misused, because a single spike on one replicate can move it substantially.<\/p>\n

Time to ignition and total heat release<\/h3>\n

Time to ignition is measured from the start of irradiation to sustained flaming, with the spark igniter positioned above the specimen centre [1]. It is strongly irradiance-dependent, which is why it is only comparable between runs at the same flux. Total heat release integrates the HRR curve and answers a different question: not how fierce, but how much fuel is in the specimen.<\/p>\n

Mass loss and effective heat of combustion<\/h3>\n

The specimen sits on a balance recording mass continuously. Dividing heat release by mass loss gives the effective heat of combustion \u2014 the heat actually obtained per kilogram of material consumed. Comparing it with the gross heat of combustion determined by a bomb calorimeter method such as ISO 1716 10<\/a> tells you how completely the material is burning in the gas phase, which is exactly the question a flame-retardant formulation is trying to answer.<\/p>\n

Smoke production and specific extinction area<\/h3>\n

A laser beam across the exhaust duct measures the attenuation caused by smoke, giving smoke production rate and, normalised by mass loss, the specific extinction area. This is where the cone calorimeter overlaps with dedicated smoke apparatus: for classification purposes in Europe, smoke is normally taken from the SBI run, while the cone provides the material-level figure used in research and in transport frameworks.<\/p>\n

Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide yields<\/h3>\n

Gas analysis on the duct gives CO and CO\u2082 concentrations, from which yields per kilogram of material are calculated. Carbon monoxide yield is the input to toxic potency assessments, and it rises sharply under ventilation-limited conditions \u2014 a reason to treat it as scenario-dependent rather than a material constant.<\/p>\n

How a Cone Calorimeter Test Derives Those Numbers<\/h2>\n
\n \"ISO<\/a>
The conical radiant heater sits above a horizontal 100 mm \u00d7 100 mm specimen; the hood above captures everything the fire produces.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Oxygen consumption calorimetry<\/h3>\n

Most organic materials release close to the same amount of heat per unit mass of oxygen consumed, which is why measuring the oxygen depletion in the exhaust is a robust way to measure heat release without building a calorimeter around the fire. ISO 5660-1 fixes the constant at 13.1 \u00d7 10\u00b3 kJ per kg of O\u2082 [1], and the oxygen analyser is specified as a paramagnetic type with a range of at least 0\u201325 % and a response better than 12 s, because the whole heat release calculation inherits the analyser’s speed and stability [1].<\/p>\n

The exhaust duct and the gas analysis chain<\/h3>\n

All combustion products are collected by a hood above the specimen and drawn through a duct at a nominally constant volumetric flow. In that duct sit the gas sampling ring, the smoke attenuation measurement and the thermocouples and orifice plate used to derive the flow. Because every reported quantity downstream depends on that flow being known and stable, the duct and its orifice plate are calibration items, not plumbing.<\/p>\n

What a Cone Calorimeter Does Not Measure<\/h2>\n

It is not a classification test on its own<\/h3>\n

A cone calorimeter test produces data, not a class. In the European construction products route, the classification is issued under EN 13501-1 on the basis of the designated test programme; the cone appears as a supplementary method and, for certain classes, as part of the evidence. In the railway framework, the cone’s outputs are compared against thresholds in EN 45545-2, where MARHE is the criterion and the reported value is the mean of three specimens 6<\/a>7<\/a>. In both cases the instrument supplies numbers to somebody else’s decision rule.<\/p>\n

It does not measure flame spread or fire resistance<\/h3>\n

Two clarifications that come up constantly in procurement conversations. First, the cone is a bench-scale, horizontally oriented<\/strong>, radiatively heated test on a 100 mm \u00d7 100 mm specimen \u2014 it does not measure how far a flame travels across a surface. That is the job of lateral flame spread methods and of the SBI. Second, it measures reaction to fire, not fire resistance: it says nothing about whether a wall, door or floor assembly maintains loadbearing capacity, integrity or insulation in a furnace test. Confusing the two families is the single most common specification error in this field.<\/p>\n

A third boundary is worth stating explicitly because it causes arguments in project meetings: cone calorimeter data describes the material<\/strong> under one specific thermal insult, not the product<\/strong> in its installed geometry. A laminate that delaminates, a coating that intumesces, a panel that falls away from its substrate \u2014 none of those system behaviours are reproduced on a 100 mm square held flat in a frame. That is exactly why the intermediate-scale tests exist, and why a good development programme runs both rather than trying to make one stand in for the other.<\/p>\n

There is also a size correction worth making, because it appears in competitor material: the name refers to the shape of the heater<\/strong>, a truncated cone, not to a conical specimen. The specimen is a flat square plate [1].<\/p>\n

Irradiance: The Cone Calorimeter Test Setting That Changes Every Number<\/h2>\n
\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u8bbe\u5b9a\u8f90\u7167\u5ea6<\/th>\n\u4ee3\u8868\u573a\u666f<\/th>\n\u5bf9\u7ed3\u679c\u7684\u5f71\u54cd<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
25 kW\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n\u65e9\u671f \/ \u9634\u71c3\u9636\u6bb5\u706b<\/td>\n\u70b9\u71c3\u65f6\u95f4\u663e\u8457\u53d8\u957f\uff0c\u90e8\u5206\u6750\u6599\u4e0d\u70b9\u71c3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35 kW\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n\u5e38\u7528\u4e2d\u95f4\u6863<\/td>\n\u591a\u6570\u6750\u6599\u7a33\u5b9a\u71c3\u70e7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50 kW\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n\u53d1\u5c55\u4e2d\u7684\u5ba4\u5185\u706b<\/td>\n\u5e38\u7528\u5bf9\u7167\u6863\uff0c\u70b9\u71c3\u5feb<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
75 kW\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n\u8f70\u71c3\u524d \/ \u5145\u5206\u53d1\u5c55\u706b<\/td>\n\u70b9\u71c3\u6781\u5feb\uff0c\u5cf0\u503c\u6700\u9ad8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

How long a run lasts and what the sampling rate means<\/h3>\n

Run length is set by the material, not by the operator: the test continues until the specimen stops releasing heat. What the standard does control is how often data is captured \u2014 for short burns of three minutes or less the sampling interval is tightened, and for longer runs it is relaxed, so that a fast-developing material is not smoothed away and a long smouldering run does not produce an unmanageable dataset [1]. For reporting, this matters because a peak read from coarse sampling on a rapidly burning specimen will understate the true maximum.<\/p>\n

ISO 5660-1 permits irradiance over a 0\u201375 kW\/m\u00b2 range [1], and the choice is not cosmetic: every output shifts with it. Reports must state the flux, and comparisons across different fluxes are invalid. Where a framework prescribes a flux \u2014 as the railway standard does with two levels \u2014 that prescription overrides laboratory convenience.<\/p>\n

Where the Numbers Get Used<\/h2>\n
\n \"Bench-scale<\/a>
Bench scale versus intermediate scale: the cone gives material properties, the SBI gives product behaviour in a corner configuration.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u6846\u67b6 \/ \u7528\u9014<\/th>\n\u5f15\u7528\u7684\u91cf<\/th>\n\u8bf4\u660e<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\u8f68\u9053\u4ea4\u901a EN 45545-2<\/td>\nMARHE\u3001\u6309\u5371\u9669\u7b49\u7ea7\u5206\u9608\u503c<\/td>\n\u4e09\u4e2a\u8bd5\u6837\u7684\u5e73\u5747\u503c\u5224\u636e [6][7]<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u5317\u7f8e\u6750\u6599\u7814\u7a76 ASTM E1354<\/td>\nHRR\u3001pkHRR\u3001THR\u3001TTI<\/td>\n\u4e0e ISO 5660-1 \u539f\u7406\u76f8\u540c 3<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NFPA 271<\/td>\n\u70ed\u91ca\u653e\u4e0e\u4ea7\u70df<\/td>\n\u5317\u7f8e\u7f16\u53f7\u7684\u540c\u539f\u7406\u65b9\u6cd5 4<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u4e2d\u56fd GB\/T 16172<\/td>\n\u540c ISO 5660-1<\/td>\n\u73b0\u884c\u7248\u4e3a 2026 \u7248 8<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u79d1\u7814\u4e0e\u914d\u65b9\u5f00\u53d1<\/td>\nEHC\u3001SEA\u3001CO \u4ea7\u7387<\/td>\n\u963b\u71c3\u673a\u7406\u7814\u7a76\u7684\u4e3b\u529b\u6570\u636e<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u706b\u707e\u6a21\u578b\u8f93\u5165<\/td>\nHRR \u66f2\u7ebf\u3001TTI<\/td>\n\u4f9b\u533a\u57df\u6a21\u578b\u4e0e\u573a\u6a21\u578b\u4f7f\u7528<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

The two bottom rows are where the instrument earns its keep outside compliance work. Composite laminates are a case in point: the cone has been used at national laboratories to evaluate the flammability of composite materials, where the shape of the heat release curve \u2014 a single sharp peak or a broad double hump \u2014 tells the formulator more than any single number does 5<\/a>. Fire modelling is the other major consumer, because a heat release curve at a known irradiance, paired with an ignition time, is exactly the input a zone or field model needs.<\/p>\n

Terminology matters in all of this. The fire safety vocabulary published as ISO 13943 9<\/a> is the reference that fixes what terms such as heat release rate, ignitability and fire performance mean across the ISO fire standards, and using its definitions avoids the situation where two laboratories mean different things by the same phrase.<\/p>\n

Sample Preparation and Reproducibility<\/h2>\n
\n \"Instrument<\/a>
The load cell under the specimen holder records mass continuously, which is what makes mass loss rate and effective heat of combustion available.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u53d8\u91cf<\/th>\n\u5b9e\u52a1\u8981\u70b9<\/th>\n\u540e\u679c<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\u8bd5\u6837\u5c3a\u5bf8<\/td>\n100 mm \u00d7 100 mm \u5e73\u677f\uff0c\u66b4\u9732\u9762\u7531\u4fdd\u6301\u6846\u754c\u5b9a<\/td>\n\u5c3a\u5bf8\u9519\u8bef\u76f4\u63a5\u6539\u53d8\u53d7\u70ed\u9762\u79ef<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u539a\u5ea6\u4e0e\u6784\u9020<\/td>\n\u6309\u6700\u7ec8\u4f7f\u7528\u72b6\u6001\uff0c\u542b\u57fa\u6750\u4e0e\u7c98\u7ed3<\/td>\n\u7ed3\u679c\u4e0e\u7cfb\u7edf\u7ed1\u5b9a<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u72b6\u6001\u8c03\u8282<\/td>\n\u89c4\u5b9a\u6e29\u6e7f\u5ea6\u81f3\u6052\u91cd<\/td>\n\u542b\u6c34\u7387\u6539\u53d8\u70b9\u71c3\u4e0e\u70ed\u91ca\u653e<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u8f90\u7167\u5ea6\u8bbe\u5b9a<\/td>\n\u6309\u6846\u67b6\u6216\u5bf9\u7167\u9700\u6c42\u56fa\u5b9a\u5e76\u8bb0\u5f55<\/td>\n\u8de8\u8f90\u7167\u5ea6\u6bd4\u8f83\u65e0\u6548<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u4e0d\u7a33\u5b9a\u6750\u6599\u7684\u5904\u7406<\/td>\n\u7194\u5316\u3001\u6536\u7f29\u3001\u5377\u66f2\u8005\u9700\u7528\u4fdd\u6301\u6846\u6216\u6539\u53d8\u95f4\u8ddd<\/td>\n\u5904\u7406\u4e0d\u5f53\u4f7f TTI \u4e0d\u53ef\u6bd4 [1]<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u91cd\u590d\u6570\u91cf<\/td>\n\u901a\u5e38\u81f3\u5c11\u4e09\u5757<\/td>\n\u5cf0\u503c\u91cf\u5bf9\u5355\u6b21\u6ce2\u52a8\u654f\u611f<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Common Misreadings of Cone Calorimeter Data<\/h2>\n
\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u8bef\u8bfb<\/th>\n\u6b63\u786e\u7406\u89e3<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\u628a\u5cf0\u503c HRR \u5f53\u6750\u6599\u5e38\u6570<\/td>\n\u5cf0\u503c\u53d7\u566a\u58f0\u3001\u8bd5\u6837\u6784\u9020\u4e0e\u8f90\u7167\u5ea6\u5f71\u54cd\uff0c\u770b\u66f2\u7ebf\u5f62\u72b6\u66f4\u7a33<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u8de8\u8f90\u7167\u5ea6\u6bd4\u8f83\u7ed3\u679c<\/td>\n\u6bcf\u4e2a\u8f90\u7167\u5ea6\u662f\u4e00\u7ec4\u72ec\u7acb\u6761\u4ef6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u628a\u9525\u5f62\u91cf\u70ed\u4eea\u7ed3\u679c\u5f53\u5206\u7ea7<\/td>\n\u5206\u7ea7\u7531\u5206\u7ea7\u6807\u51c6\u53d1\u5e03\uff0c\u4eea\u5668\u53ea\u63d0\u4f9b\u6570\u636e<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u8ba4\u4e3a\u8bd5\u6837\u662f\u5706\u9525\u5f62<\/td>\n\u8bd5\u6837\u662f\u5e73\u677f\uff0c\u9525\u5f62\u6307\u52a0\u70ed\u5668\u5f62\u72b6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u7528\u5b83\u8bc4\u4ef7\u6784\u4ef6\u7684\u8010\u706b\u6027\u80fd<\/td>\n\u90a3\u662f\u8010\u706b\u8bd5\u9a8c\u7089\u7684\u8303\u7574\uff0c\u673a\u7406\u5b8c\u5168\u4e0d\u540c<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u5ffd\u7565\u4fdd\u6301\u6846\u4e0e\u8fb9\u7f18\u6761\u4ef6<\/td>\n\u8fb9\u7f18\u4e0e\u8fb9\u6846\u663e\u8457\u6539\u53d8\u5c0f\u5c3a\u5bf8\u8bd5\u6837\u884c\u4e3a<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Equipment for Cone Calorimeter Testing<\/h2>\n

A cone calorimeter test is only as defensible as the calibration behind it, so the equipment decision is really a decision about the gas analysis train, the heat flux meter and the documentation that comes with them. Three items deserve specific scrutiny before any purchase order: the oxygen analyser type and its response time, because it drives every heat release value; the heat flux meter and its calibration chain, because it sets the irradiance the specimen actually sees; and the balance, because mass loss underpins two of the nine outputs. Ask for all three as written specifications with traceability, not as marketing bullets.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u8bbe\u5907<\/th>\n\u7528\u9014<\/th>\n\u9002\u7528<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\u9525\u5f62\u91cf\u70ed\u4eea<\/a><\/td>\nISO 5660-1 \u5168\u5957\u8f93\u51fa<\/td>\n\u6750\u6599\u70ed\u91ca\u653e\u4e0e\u4ea7\u70df\u7814\u7a76<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u5efa\u6750\u71c3\u70e7\u70ed\u503c\u8bd5\u9a8c\u4eea<\/a><\/td>\nISO 1716 \u603b\u71c3\u70e7\u70ed<\/td>\n\u4e0e EHC \u5bf9\u7167\u5224\u65ad\u71c3\u70e7\u5b8c\u5168\u7a0b\u5ea6 [10]<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u70df\u6c14\u6bd2\u6027\u8bd5\u9a8c\u88c5\u7f6e<\/a><\/td>\n\u71c3\u70e7\u6c14\u4f53\u6bd2\u6027<\/td>\n\u4e0e CO \u4ea7\u7387\u914d\u5957<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SBI \u8bd5\u9a8c\u88c5\u7f6e<\/a><\/td>\nEN 13823<\/td>\n\u6b27\u76df\u5236\u54c1\u5206\u7ea7\u8def\u7ebf<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u5efa\u7b51\u6750\u6599\u4e0d\u71c3\u6027\u8bd5\u9a8c\u88c5\u7f6e<\/a><\/td>\nISO 1182<\/td>\nA1\/A2 \u7ea7\u8def\u7ebf 11<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

For the clause-by-clause apparatus requirements, calibration evidence and procurement checks, see our detailed guide to the ISO 5660 cone calorimeter<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n

What does a cone calorimeter measure?<\/h4>\n

It measures heat release rate and its peak, total heat release, time to ignition, mass loss, effective heat of combustion, smoke production and specific extinction area, plus carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide yields. Heat release is derived from oxygen consumption, not measured as temperature rise.<\/p>\n

What is the cone calorimeter specimen size?<\/h4>\n

The specimen is a flat plate, 100 mm by 100 mm, held horizontally under a conical radiant heater with the exposed area defined by a holder. The word “cone” refers to the shape of the heater, not to the shape of the specimen.<\/p>\n

What is the difference between heat release rate and total heat release?<\/h4>\n

Heat release rate is the instantaneous rate, in kilowatts per square metre, and describes how fierce the burning is at a moment. Total heat release is the integral of that curve and describes how much energy the specimen contained.<\/p>\n

What irradiance level should I use?<\/h4>\n

Use the level your target framework prescribes, or a level already used in the literature you want to compare against, and state it in the report. ISO 5660-1 permits 0\u201375 kW\/m\u00b2, and results at different levels are not comparable.<\/p>\n

Is a cone calorimeter result a fire classification?<\/h4>\n

No. The instrument produces measured data. A classification is issued under a classification standard by the body authorised to do so, using the designated test programme for the product and market in question.<\/p>\n

What is MARHE?<\/h4>\n

MARHE is the maximum average rate of heat emission, a value calculated from the heat release curve rather than read from a sensor. It is used as the criterion in the European railway fire standard, evaluated against thresholds that depend on hazard level, and taken as the mean of three specimens.<\/p>\n

Does a cone calorimeter measure flame spread?<\/h4>\n

No. It is a bench-scale test on a small horizontal specimen under a radiant heater, and it does not measure how far a flame travels across a surface. Flame spread is assessed by other methods, including lateral flame spread tests and the Single Burning Item test.<\/p>\n

Conclusion: A Sequence for Using Cone Calorimeter Data<\/h2>\n

The value of a cone calorimeter test comes from treating it as nine correlated measurements rather than one headline number. A formulation that lowers peak heat release but shortens ignition time has not obviously improved anything; one that cuts total heat release while raising carbon monoxide yield has traded one hazard for another. Read the set, against the flux you chose, and against the framework you are answering to.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Decide what question you are answering \u2014 material screening, formulation comparison, or input to a named framework.<\/li>\n
  2. Fix the irradiance from that answer, and record it.<\/li>\n
  3. Run at least three replicates; treat the peak as a distribution, not a number.<\/li>\n
  4. Report the derived quantities you actually need, with units and flux stated.<\/li>\n
  5. Hand the data to the classification route; do not present it as a class.<\/li>\n
  6. Where combustion completeness matters, pair the run with a gross heat of combustion measurement.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    BRT Testing supplies cone calorimeters<\/a> built to ISO 5660-1, together with the gas analysis, calibration and commissioning documentation that makes the data defensible. Send us your target framework and product construction, and we will specify the configuration and the acceptance checks in writing.<\/p>\n

    Shenyang Baoruitong Automation Equipment Co., Ltd.<\/h3>\n

    BRT Testing manufactures fire testing and spectroscopic instruments in Shenyang, China, including cone calorimeters, Single Burning Item apparatus, non-combustibility furnaces, gross heat of combustion testers and smoke toxicity equipment. Our technical team supports method selection, installation, calibration and operator training for laboratories working to ISO, EN, ASTM and GB frameworks.<\/p>\n

    Sources<\/h2>\n
      \n
    1. iTeh Standards \u2014 ISO 5660-1:2015<\/a><\/li>\n
    2. UNI Ente Italiano di Normazione \u2014 ISO 5660-1:2015<\/a><\/li>\n
    3. ASTM International \u2014 E1354-23 Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials and Products Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter<\/a><\/li>\n
    4. NFPA \u2014 NFPA 271<\/a><\/li>\n
    5. NIST \u2014 Cone Calorimeter Evaluation of the Flammability of Composite Materials<\/a><\/li>\n
    6. Fire Testing Technology \u2014 EN 45545-2 in the EU railway industry<\/a><\/li>\n
    7. CURRENTA \u2014 EN 45545-2 heat release testing to ISO 5660-1 (technical note)<\/a><\/li>\n
    8. SAMR (China) \u2014 GB\/T 16172-2026 standard record<\/a><\/li>\n
    9. UNI Ente Italiano di Normazione \u2014 ISO 13943:2017<\/a><\/li>\n
    10. UNI Ente Italiano di Normazione \u2014 ISO 1716:2018<\/a><\/li>\n
    11. UNI Ente Italiano di Normazione \u2014 ISO 1182:2020<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n


      \n